Parenthetically, a tip for using PathFinder is to add a link to the “Favorites” folder (~/Library/Favorites) to your “Places” in the Finder/PathFinder sidebar. This also implies that any services you’ve written for Finder will automatically work in TotalFinder whereas I found I had to recreate them in Automator for the benefit of PathFinder. On the plus side, being part of Finder means you don’t have both Finder and your OFM running, as is the case with PathFinder. The only thing TotalFinder does is let you choose between a tabbed interface and a dual pane interface. Also because it mods the Finder, TotalFinder only works with Snow Leopard. On the one hand, PathFinder has a much bigger feature set, including such things as bookmarks, menu/submenu file navigation, command line, drop stack, etc. PathFinder is a stand-alone program (as is Forklift) whereas TotalFinder is a mod of the standard Finder. The current version isn’t quite as well-featured as PathFinder, for instance there’s no command line or version control, but a) it has a slightly smaller memory footprint, b) at $30 it’s cheaper for a non-educational license, and c) the interface is less cluttered and looks more like the Finder). ( Forklift is very similar to Pathfinder and also very good. In contrast is the mega-featured PathFinder 5 ($40, on sale for $25 to educational users until September 7). Two options I think are especially worth checking out are the minimalist TotalFinder (free while in development, $15 when version 1.0 comes out). When I first got a Mac this really bothered me, but as I mentioned, I’ve mostly gotten used to just keeping tons of Finder windows open.Īnyway, while a dual-pane file manager doesn’t come standard, there are a few third-party options. If you want to convert Finder in a modern and productive file explorer for the current century, try XtraFinder and FinderPop.įinderPop FinderPop review from Rocketink.In a recent post I mentioned that one of the (few) crappy things about OS X not related to network externalities is that there’s no dual-pane file manager. So I think that TotalFinder got first, but XtraFinder is getting better in each release. There are more features worth checking (selecting files using patterns for example). These are the main reasons that made me switch to XtraFinder. Support templates (also, I use FinderPop for this)ĭisplay a panel to select destination, and save last used path (I use this a lot, but I had to open a default window, navigate, align right of the screen) dual window - vertical (with hotkey) (awesome!) (no more ⌘+i, new window, close new window) show total size of selected items in Status Bar (awesome!) click any item in the path bar to show contents menu (though I use FinderPop) I need to use and test XtraFinder more time to check its stability, but TotalFinder is pretty stable so far.Įxtra features I love from XtraFinder Exclusive features I find XtraFinder faster when drag'n'dropping files to move or copy, specially in remote drives using afp protocol. These are the reasons: TotalFinder v.1.6.2 XtraFinder v0.23 Today I've installed XtraFinder and I'm considering never look back. I had already paid my TotalFinder license so I didn't considere try or switch. Not so long ago XtraFinder appeared as a free alternative. I've been using TotalFinder since the first versions, just for the tabs and folders first features. If you want to improve Finder (I said improve, not replace (PathFinder, Forklift)) you have 2 options: TotalFinder, XtraFinder. It's a shame that apple sells OSX as the most modern OS and it has a so limited file explorer. As a totally obsessed "best tool for the job" osx user I need to keep looking for new apps or for better apps than the ones I'm using now.Īs a lot of users I spend a high percent of my time using the OSX Finder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |